The Ogiek are one of the last groups of hunter gatherers in Kenya. Their ancestral land is in the Mau Forest in the Rift Valley of Kenya.

For many years, the Kenyan government has threatened them with eviction, in the name of conservation.

Last week, the African Court on Human and Peoples’ Rights ruled that the Ogiek have the right to live in the Mau Forest and that the government of Kenya was wrong to evict them.

Lucy Claridge is a human rights lawyer who works with the Minority Rights Group    International. She was the lead lawyer for the Ogiek. She told the BBC World Service that,

“This is an extremely positive outcome. It sends a very clear message to the government of Kenya, but also to other governments in Africa, that they must respect the rights of their indigenous communities, and that includes their land rights.”

Daniel Kobei, Executive Director of Ogiek Peoples’ Development Programme, said in a statement,

“For the Ogiek, this is history in the making. The issue of Ogiek land rights has finally been heard and the case has empowered them to feel relevant. I know that the case also gives hope to other indigenous peoples: it has made the issues seem real.”

And in a statement, Claridge explains the significance of the ruling:

“Crucially the Court has recognised that the Ogiek – and therefore many other indigenous peoples in Africa – have a leading role to play as guardians of local ecosystems, and in conserving and protecting land and natural resources, including the Mau Forest.”

Minority Rights points out that this is the first time that the African Court has ruled on an indigenous peoples’ rights case, since it was set up in 2006. It is the largest case ever brought before the Court.

This is the first time that the Ogiek’s rights to their ancestral land have been recognised. The African Court on Human and Peoples’ Rights is the highest human rights regional body, and Kenya is a party to the African Charter on Human and Peoples’ Rights. As Claridge explained to the BBC, this means that Kenya has to abide by the ruling.

Victory after eight years

In the judgement the African Court gave a timeline of the legal case:

  • In October 2009, the Kenya Forest Service issued an eviction notice, that required the Ogiek and other settlers to leave the Mau Forest within thirty days.
  • On 14 November 2009, Minority Rights Group International, Ogiek Peoples’ Development Program, and the Center for Minority Rights Development wrote to the African Commission on Human and Peoples’ Rights about the eviction notice.
  • On 23 November 2009, the African Commission requested the Kenyan government to suspend the evictions.
  • On 12 July 2012, following the lack of response from the Kenyan government, the African Commission referred the case to the African Court.
  • At its 36th session, from 9 March to 27 March 2015, the African Court decided to propose to the Kenyan government and the Ogiek that “they engage in amicable settlement”. This attempt to settle the matter did not succeed.
  • At its 40th session, from 29 February to 18 March 2016 the African Court decided to proceed with the case.

The Mau Forest Complex covers about 400,000 hectares. It was the largest area of forest in East Africa, but today large parts of it have been deforested. 35,000 Ogiek people are the claimants in this case.

The Kenyan government argues that the Mau Forest is a water catchment and that the land belonged to the government.

Court confirms that the Mau Forest is the Ogiek’s ancestral home

The African Court stated that the Mau Forest is the Ogiek’s ancestral home, that the Ogiek rely on the forest for their livelihoods, religious and cultural life.

The Court also stated that conservation of the forest was not a sufficient reason for evicting the Ogiek. It ruled that there was no evidence that the Ogiek had destroyed the forest, or that evictions of the Ogiek helped to protect the forests.

The African Court noted that the Mau Forest has been handed over to others, who are destroying the forest. In 2009, the New York Times reported that,

"It was clear that timber companies are continuing to chew up large tracts of the Mau, knocking down giant trees and turning them into doors and plywood for export."

Violations of the African Charter on Human and Peoples’ Rights

The African Court ruled that the Kenyan government violated seven articles of the African Charter.

In a series of “milestone” tweets, Claridge explains why the ruling is so important and how the government of Kenya violated the African Charter.




P.O.Box:424-20115, Egerton, Kenya

Twitter Display


Make a donation